Aphra
Behn, “Oroonoko” (200-246)
In
the “Oroonoko,” the characters have specific qualities to them that are either
different from other characters or similar. The protagonist, Oroonoko (or
Caesar); is portrayed as honorable, a man of great importance and beautiful.
For example, “The whole Proportion and Air of his Face was so noble, and
exactly form’d, that bating his Colour there cou’d be nothing in Nature more
beautiful, agreeable and handsome” (205). Being the protagonist, he is meant to
stand all above the rest in beauty, grace and capabilities, especially because
of his social status as a Prince. Personally speaking, I believe she chose to
have him stand out so it would be obvious that he is supposed to be a heroic
character, considering he has all the characteristics of one: honor, beauty,
determination, etc. However, the antagonist is the complete opposite, as should
be. This time, our antagonist happens to be the old King of Coramantien. He is
depicted as very old, shrewd, evil, lustful, cruel, jealous, and full of rage.
Due to being King, his word is absolute and must be obeyed. He is so cruel that
he abuses his power and calls upon Imoinda to his apartment and attempts to
make her his knowing fully-well that Oroonoko and Imoinda were lovers. As
written, “This gave the old King some Affliction: but he salv’d it with this,
that the Obedience the People pay to their King, was not at all inferior to
what they pay’d their Gods: And what Love wou’d not oblige Imoinda to do, Duty
wou’d compel her to” (207). The King abuses his power to use Imoinda in fulfilling
his lust and even goes as far as to compare himself to a God. This is simply
just cruel to do to your grandchild and even more cruel to use power against an
innocent.
One
theme that pops up in this story is Honor. When reading, I noticed that Honor was
popping up all over the place, like on page 206: “receiv’d him, as the greatest
Honour the Gods cou’d do her.” Another example would be: “While the Man of no
Honour, suffers every moment the scorn and contempt of the honester World, and
dies every day ignominiously in his Fame, which is more valuable than Life…”
(221). Oroonoko knows what is right from what is wrong and I feel that she made
this the case so that people could make a connection between the character and
the audience. I find the mentioning of honor to be extremely important because
of how he consistently sticks by it throughout the story. It seems that “Honor”
was the only sustainable thing that still lived, even with how much the
characters lost in the story. Honor seemed to play a really important part with
the decision to kill Imoinda and her child. Oroonoko felt that it would be
dishonorable to make Imoinda and the child live through the tortures of
slavery. Therefore, he killed them, with her gladly accepting death.
The
historical context of slavery plays a huge part in this story. I feel that this
is because there were wide-ranging opinions on slavery back then. Portrayals of slavery
also show the European/Western views throughout this story. For example, “that
bating his Colour there cou’d be nothing in Nature more beautiful, agreeable
and handsome” (205). This basically states that if you take his color out of
the equation, he would be considered beautiful and great. In complete
obviousness, we see the view of the Western world that “African’s are inferior”
and that white people stand at the “top”. However, he shows a slight view
through Oroonoko that slavery is a struggle, although it is mainly “whitened up”
to show more of European/Western views and to make more of a connection to the
European audience. This “whitening up” can be seen through how Oroonoko’s "Roman-like" looks,
social status, and capabilities make him stand above the rest of slaves
according to the white slave-owner characters.
Behn, Aphra. "Oroonoko". The Norton Anthology World Literature, Third Edition, Vol. D. Martin Puchner. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2012. Pages 200-246. Fairfield Medium with the display set in Aperto.
Behn, Aphra. "Oroonoko". The Norton Anthology World Literature, Third Edition, Vol. D. Martin Puchner. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2012. Pages 200-246. Fairfield Medium with the display set in Aperto.
Hi Kaylee, even though I did not choose the theme of honor, I totally agree it is a very strong theme in the story. I love how you highlighted that honor was the rationale behind the death of Imoinda and the child. How Oroonoko viewed allowing her to be raped and tortured, and his child made to be another human commodity for European gain would have been dishonorable and cruel. Enjoyed your Analysis.
ReplyDeleteHi Kaylee, thank you for your hard work! I agree with your theme because Oroonoko seems totally honorable. I also love the fact that you put a lot of quotes in your Analyze. And since the author spend so much time giving details on the characters, it gave us a good POV of them, especially Oroonoko so yes he is honorable!
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree that Oroonoko was idolized the way he was to make him seem like a heroic character! I like how you took the time to find supporting quotes to back up your observations in the story and added tons of detail, it gave us a clear message of the points you were trying to make.
ReplyDeleteI also thought Honor was a huge theme throughout this reading. I love how you really went in depth and explained how honor was mentioned throughout Oroonoko. I may have to back and add a few things to my notes!
ReplyDeleteI really like how you explained the protagonist and the antagonist, and who they were and why they were the protagonist/antagonist. I also can appreciate the quotes you used, as it really brings your point full circle and also gives the reader a better description and idea of the characters. This story was somewhat hard for me to get in to and follow, as I felt the sentences were long and drawn out. Your analysis helped me understand different perspectives and views of this story.
ReplyDelete